The Washington Redskins Controversy

Redskins primary logo 1972-1981, 1983-present

Redskins primary logo 1972-1981, 1983-present (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Since the 1980s the name of the NFL team the Washington Redskins has been in conversation because of its controversial name. The Redskins are meant to represent Washington D.C. but is located in suburban Maryland.

The term “Redskin” not only is an offensive term to describe Native Americans but it is a term that describes the bounty people received for the pelts or scalps of Native Americans.

The name of the team was given in honor of the 1933 head coach who was a member of the Sioux nations. Despite this, in conversations about the team name Redskin officials barely mention this explanation. Most Redskin officials and fans believe that the name is not meant to be offensive to the Native American people. In other developments the owner of the Redskins does not believe that the team name is offensive and does not intend on changing it.

In addition to this statement the Redskins also have a section on their official team website called “We Are Proud To Be Called Redskins” where they feature high school athletic teams who use the same team name “Redskins.” This piece not only includes highlights but also quotes from school representatives stating that they see no problem with using the name.

English: Santana Moss

Santana Moss (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

There have been protest since the 1980s by the remaining Native American population in the district; however, the current population is only made up of 180 people respectively. Recently the discussion over the team name has been revived because of recent developments and events. On Feb. 7, 2013, the first ever symposium at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of the American Indian opened conversation on racism in sports teams’ names and mascots. There also have been many Native American activists who have taken action to sue the team because of the offensive meaning to the term redskin. Lastly the current Mayor of Washington D.C., Vincent Gray, stated that if the team were to move back to the district, the name would have to be a topic of conversation.

My Take

There is a lack of knowledge on the origins of the term “Redskin” as well as Native American culture. Not finding the term itself or its use of redskin controversial is where there is disconnect with the culture from which it oppresses. Until everyone is familiar with the history behind the term or Native American culture we cannot make an informed stance on the controversy. Regardless of your stance, it is clear that Native Americans find this term offensive and have spoken out against it. I think that because the term redskin is related to this population their opinion on its use is important and should be considered.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s